← Back to Livestreams
Livestream

NFB & Chill: The Immune System & Biofeedback

Andrew Hill, PhD

NFB & Chill: The Immune System & Biofeedback - Livestream Summary

Dr. Andrew Hill explored the emerging intersection of neurofeedback training and immune system modulation in this week's livestream. While setting up his own alpha/SMR training session, he examined the current research landscape and shared clinical observations about using brain training to support immune function.

The Wild West of Immune Neurofeedback

The field sits at an interesting crossroads. We have compelling individual studies showing immune changes from neurofeedback, but not enough research to establish solid protocols. Hill reviewed about a dozen quality studies - far short of the 50+ needed for robust meta-analyses.

The most promising protocols involve alpha training at parietal/occipital sites, SMR training, and alpha-theta protocols. But effect sizes remain modest, and the field lacks standardization.

A Compelling Case Study

Hill shared a striking clinical example: a client with alcohol dependency and compromised immunity who underwent two months of alpha-theta and SMR training (about 30 sessions total). The goal was addressing sleep and alcohol issues, not immune function.

Before training, the client's T-cell count was around 20% of normal levels. After the neurofeedback protocol, testing showed T-cells at 120% of typical levels - a dramatic shift that aligned with research by Dr. Gary Schumer showing neurofeedback can raise T-cell counts.

This wasn't planned as immune therapy, yet the immune benefits were substantial. The client's EEG showed the classic pattern of chronic stress/addiction: low voltage, fast activity with virtually no delta production. Post-training, he generated better delta and increased alpha production.

The Neuromechanisms at Play

The immune-brain connection operates through well-established pathways:

HPA Axis Modulation: Alpha and theta training appear to downregulate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal stress response system. Chronic HPA activation suppresses immune function, so training these slower rhythms can restore immune capacity.

Autonomic Rebalancing: The vagus nerve directly innervates immune organs. Alpha training enhances vagal tone while reducing sympathetic dominance, creating a more immune-supportive autonomic state.

Posterior Cingulate Influence: Training at parietal sites like PZ targets the posterior cingulate, a major alpha generator that helps regulate overall brain rhythm and stress response.

Protocol Insights

Hill demonstrated his own session setup: alpha training (6.75-9.75 Hz) at PZ, followed by SMR training (11-12 Hz) at CZ, both inhibiting high beta (20-32 Hz). This mirrors the successful protocols in the literature.

Why These Frequencies?: Alpha rhythms promote the relaxed-but-alert state that optimizes parasympathetic function. SMR training enhances calm focus while reducing anxiety-driven beta activity that taxes the immune system.

Notable Q&A Highlights

Question: Have you seen autoimmune disease progression slow with neurofeedback?

The T-cell case study suggests significant potential, but Hill emphasized this remains largely anecdotal territory. He's used similar protocols for immune support during COVID recovery and chronic immune challenges, with subjective improvements noted by clients. However, few clients pursue the blood work needed to quantify changes.

Question: Connection between alcoholism and immune dysfunction?

Hill noted the client's EEG showed classic addiction patterns - hyperarousal with suppressed delta. This chronic stress state directly impairs immune function. The alpha training likely restored both sleep architecture and immune capacity simultaneously.

Current Limitations

The research faces several challenges:

  • Small study populations
  • Varied protocols making comparison difficult
  • Limited replication of findings
  • Most evidence remains at the individual case level
  • Need for more multimodal approaches combining neurofeedback with other interventions

Four Key Takeaways

  1. Individual Effects Are Compelling: When measured, immune changes from neurofeedback can be substantial, but we need systematic research.

  2. Alpha Training Shows Most Promise: Protocols targeting alpha enhancement, particularly at parietal sites, appear most effective for immune modulation.

  3. Multimodal Approaches May Be Key: The strongest studies combine neurofeedback with mindfulness or other stress-reduction techniques.

  4. Clinical Caution Required: While promising, practitioners should view immune protocols as supportive rather than primary treatment, given the limited research base.

The field shows genuine potential, but we're still in the early stages of understanding how to reliably harness neurofeedback for immune optimization. Hill continues using these protocols clinically while hoping for more rigorous research to establish evidence-based guidelines.

For practitioners interested in this application, start with established alpha/SMR protocols and track both subjective reports and objective measures when possible. The mechanisms are sound - we just need more data to refine the approach.