← Back to Livestreams
Livestream

🧠 Neurofeedback & QEEG AMA: Your Questions Answered Live

Andrew Hill, PhD

Neurofeedback & QEEG AMA: Core Questions Answered

This livestream covered fundamental neurofeedback questions that both newcomers and experienced practitioners ask. Dr. Hill addressed everything from basic mechanisms to session logistics, providing clarity on how this brain training actually works in practice.

What Neurofeedback Actually Is

Neurofeedback is exercising brain waves through real-time measurement and feedback. You attach sensors to measure specific brain activity, and when your brain briefly moves in the desired direction, the computer provides auditory and visual rewards. This creates an unconscious learning loop.

The process bypasses conscious control entirely. You can't feel your brainwaves, so there's no "trying" involved. The brain gradually learns to maintain states that keep the feedback flowing smoothly through unconscious operant conditioning.

Question: How long are sessions and what do they feel like?

Sessions run about 30 minutes. It's mostly passive—you sit somewhat aware of the screen and audio as it stops and starts based on your brain activity. You're not focusing or trying hard, just staying relaxed while avoiding muscle tension that interferes with signal quality. After 3-4 sessions, most people notice subjective changes either during training or hours afterward.

The Brain Mapping Connection

Question: How do brain maps guide protocol selection?

Brain maps (quantitative EEG) show patterns, but they're not diagnostic in a top-down sense. You might see reduced beta activity in left frontal regions associated with executive function, or excess alpha where you'd expect focused beta activity. These patterns inform training targets, but the meaning requires clinical interpretation alongside the person's goals.

For example, that left-side prefrontal area stabilizes executive function and attention. When it's underactive (less beta, more alpha), you might design protocols to strengthen beta production in that region. The brain map guides where to place electrodes and what frequencies to target.

Technical Logistics

Question: Can you do neurofeedback while on medication?

Generally yes, though some medications can affect EEG patterns. The training adapts to your current brain state, medication and all. However, significant medication changes during training can shift your baseline, so coordination with prescribers helps optimize timing.

Question: Are the effects permanent?

Neurofeedback creates learning, similar to motor skill acquisition. Well-learned patterns tend to stick, but like any skill, they can fade without use. Most people maintain benefits long-term, though some do periodic "tune-up" sessions.

The UCLA Connection

Neurofeedback's modern clinical form was largely developed at UCLA by Dr. Barry Sterman in the 1960s-70s. What started as somewhat fringe science has gained mainstream neuroscience acceptance. The mechanism—operant conditioning of neural activity—is well-established, even if specific protocol optimization continues evolving.

Key Mechanisms

The training works through unconscious associative learning. Your brain notices the connection between certain neural states and external feedback, gradually shifting toward rewarded patterns. This happens below conscious awareness, tapping into the same learning systems that help babies develop motor control.

Common targets include:

  • SMR (12-15 Hz): Builds calm alertness and impulse control
  • Beta (15-20 Hz): Strengthens focus and executive function
  • Alpha (8-12 Hz): Can be trained up for relaxation or down for activation

Takeaways

  • Neurofeedback is passive brain exercise through real-time feedback
  • Sessions are 30 minutes of relaxed attention, not effortful concentration
  • Effects typically emerge after 3-4 sessions
  • Brain maps inform protocol design but require clinical interpretation
  • The training creates learning that generally persists long-term
  • It works through unconscious conditioning, not conscious control

The field has evolved from fringe science to mainstream neuroscience tool, backed by decades of research into operant conditioning of neural activity.