About This Livestream
In a major 2024 study, about one in four behaviorally unresponsive patients in a large convenience sample could still follow commands through patterns detected with EEG or fMRI. The finding exposes a basic problem: behavior, brain processing, and conscious experience can come apart.
So where is consciousness in the brain?
Tonight I separate wakefulness from conscious content, examine what anesthesia, covert consciousness, blindsight, neglect, and split-brain cases can actually tell us, and compare the major families of consciousness theory without pretending the field has selected a winner. A 2025 adversarial collaboration tested key predictions from global neuronal workspace theory and integrated information theory. The results challenged important parts of both.
This is episode two of the Consciousness to Cadence series. Episode three asks whether an artificial system could satisfy any defensible evidence standard for consciousness.
🧠 KEY TAKEAWAYS:
• Behavioral responsiveness is useful evidence about consciousness and an imperfect detector of it
• In a 2024 six-center convenience sample, 60 of 241 unresponsive participants showed command-following on EEG or fMRI
• Arousal and the contents of experience are related dimensions with partly separable mechanisms
• Conscious processing appears to depend on distributed and recurrent interactions, not one known consciousness center
• Blindsight and split-brain findings remain more contested than their textbook summaries suggest
• Global workspace, integrated information, higher-order, recurrent processing, and predictive approaches make overlapping claims
• A large 2025 study challenged key predictions of both GNWT and IIT and did not identify a winner
• A neural correlate is not automatically the cause, full mechanism, or location of experience
📚 KEY RESEARCH:
• Bodien et al. (2024). Cognitive Motor Dissociation in Disorders of Consciousness. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2400645
• Cogitate Consortium et al. (2025). Adversarial testing of global neuronal workspace and integrated information theories of consciousness. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08888-1
• Seth and Bayne (2022). Theories of consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-022-00587-4
• Mashour et al. (2020). Conscious Processing and the Global Neuronal Workspace Hypothesis. Neuron. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.01.026
• de Haan et al. (2020). Split-Brain: What We Know Now. Neuropsychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-020-09439-3
• Derrien et al. (2022). The nature of blindsight. Neuroscience of Consciousness. https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niab043
RESOURCES:
📖 Neurofeedback: Explained: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GZ7QLM44
📞 Free consultation: https://www.peakbraininstitute.com/contact-us/locations
🌐 Dr. Hill's research: https://www.andrewhillphd.com/research
#Consciousness #Neuroscience #EEG #Brain #AIConsciousness #DrAndrewHill #NeurofeedbackAndChill
📝 Article summary coming soon
This livestream is being processed. Check back soon for a readable summary and key takeaways.