← Back to All Appearances
Guest Appearance

Training The Anterior Cingulate Dr. Andrew Hill Peak Brain Institute

#neurofeedbackpodcast #eegpodcast #phenotype #qeeg #anteriorcingulate Dr Andrew Hill Founder of Peak Brain Institute joins Jay Gunkelman the man who has read over 500,000 EEG's and Pete Jansons on the NeuroNoodle Neurofeedback Podcast to chat about phenotypes and that not all deviations are bad enjoy this short clip and if you'd like more: ​ @peakbraininstitute7638 Main Clip https://youtu.be/P8g-jDsuZtQ

Episode Summary

I sat down with Jay Gunkelman and Pete Jansons on the NeuroNoodle Neurofeedback Podcast to talk about EEG phenotypes and one idea in particular: a deviation on a brain map is not automatically a problem to erase. Sometimes it is a resource. Sometimes it is the physiology behind a complaint you already have a name for. The job is to read it accurately and then decide what, if anything, you want to train. You can watch the original conversation.

Here I want to walk through the part of that discussion I keep coming back to in the clinic: the anterior cingulate, what it does when it gets stuck, and how the same physiology shows up across people who carry very different diagnoses.

What does the anterior cingulate actually do?

The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) sits in the medial frontal wall, wrapped around the front of the corpus callosum. It handles a set of jobs that all involve monitoring and switching: error detection, conflict monitoring, and shifting attention from one target to the next. When that switching machinery runs smoothly, you notice a mismatch, register it, and move on. When it runs hot or gets locked, you get stuck on the mismatch.

The clinical word for getting stuck is perseveration. You keep returning to the same thought, the same checking behavior, the same loop, past the point where it is useful. The ACC is one of the central nodes in the cortico-striatal-thalamic loop that drives this pattern, which is why it shows up in OCD-type physiology so reliably.

Why does the same physiology show up across different diagnoses?

Here is what I see in brain maps across very different people. A high-powered CEO walks in who is excellent at hyperfocus and cannot turn it off, so he gets home and cannot soften enough to be decent to his partner. Someone else walks in washing their hands compulsively. A third person has a song stuck in their head for days. On paper these are three different stories. In the EEG, the underlying tendency can look like the same thing: an anterior cingulate that locks onto a target and will not release it.

That is the argument for reading physiology before you read the diagnostic label. The label tells you how the stuck-ness expresses itself in someone's life. The map tells you the circuit. Two people with the same ACC pattern can carry completely different diagnoses, and someone with an OCD diagnosis is describing one expression of a tendency that I also see in plenty of people who would never qualify for that label. This is the core of working with EEG phenotypes instead of working backward from a category.

Is a brain-map deviation always something to fix?

No. A deviation on a QEEG is a difference from a normative database, not a verdict. The CEO's hyperfocus is the same machinery that lets him do hard work for hours. That is a resource. The cost is that the off-switch is weak. The hand-washer has the same off-switch problem with a different behavioral target and a lot more distress attached to it.

When I read a map, I am sorting deviations into three buckets. Some are resources you want to keep and maybe make more voluntary. Some are neutral. Some are driving a complaint you want to change. The skill is telling them apart, not flattening every difference toward the average.

How do I talk to someone about their diagnosis?

I do not have to deny anyone's diagnostic language. If someone tells me they were given an OCD diagnosis, I take that seriously, because it describes something real about how they live. What I add is the physiology. If your map shows an anterior cingulate that tends to perseverate, and I describe that tendency to you, the recognition is usually immediate. People say yes, that is exactly it, that is the thing that runs all day.

That recognition matters because it reframes the experience as a circuit you can work on rather than a flaw in your character. You are not failing at letting go. You have a switching system that runs with high gain and a weak release. That is trainable.

How do you train an anterior cingulate that gets stuck?

The honest answer first: training the ACC directly is harder than training a surface rhythm, because it is a deep medial structure and the EEG sensors sit on the scalp. What we work with is the surface signature of that circuit and its connections.

One approach I find useful in concept is a midline montage that bridges front to back, Fz to Pz. The anterior cingulate and the posterior cingulate are the two poles of the cingulate, and they are core hubs of the default mode network. A bipolar Fz-Pz montage measures the potential difference between those anterior and posterior generators, which gives you a window onto how that front-to-back coordination is behaving. I want to be clear about evidence strength here: the specific claim that Fz-Pz training tunes ACC-PCC coordination is mechanistic reasoning and clinical observation, not a settled, RCT-backed result. Treat it as a working hypothesis, not established fact.

The broader principle is well-supported. Neurofeedback is operant conditioning of brain activity, and over enough sessions it produces measurable structural change. Ghaziri and colleagues showed gray and white matter changes after a neurofeedback protocol, which tells us the training is reaching tissue, not just teaching a momentary state. For the perseveration pattern specifically, the work is to give the switching system practice at releasing: rewarding the brain when it shifts and disengages rather than when it locks.

If you want the wider context for how this kind of training works, I have written about SMR neurofeedback for self-control and about neurofeedback for anxiety, which often travels with the same stuck-circuit physiology.

What this means for you

If you recognize yourself in the stuck loop, the checking, the rumination, the song that will not leave, the inability to drop a work problem when you walk in the door, start by getting the physiology read rather than arguing about which label fits. A QEEG brain map shows you whether your anterior cingulate is running with high gain and a weak release, and that picture tells you what is worth training and what is a resource you would not want to lose.

The diagnosis names how the pattern shows up in your life. The map shows you the circuit underneath it. Once you can see the circuit, perseveration stops being a personal failing and becomes a switching system you can train to let go.

<<<END>>>

Full Transcript
we can take the stuff that is clinical when it exists executive function stuff anxiety features sleep postcode brain fog seizures migraines whatever and you can work on those things from a resource perspective if I talk to you about your anterior cingulate and its tendency perhaps to perseverate being plausible based on your Maps you're like oh my God yes actually somebody gave me an OCD diagnosis oh wow I'm sorry you deal with that it's so annoying here's the physiology probably would you like to work on that so you know I don't have to deny other people's diagnostic language but I'm not really I don't really care if you're a high-powered CEO who's mostly good at hyper focusing but can't turn it off and be nice to your partner when you get home or if you're like somebody who's compulsively hand washing or somebody who just has a song stuck in your head if you tend to perseverate and the anterior cingulate is stuck for you well that's true for you you know you know how you feel