☀️ Claim your discount here: https://theenergyblueprint.com/neurofeedback - The #1 Brain Hack to get stress relief and reduce stress, improve sleep, focus better, eliminate brain fog, and more. In this episode, I am speaking with Dr. Andrew Hill who works in Cognitive Neuroscience, at UCLA and is the founder of Peak Brain Institute and a leading neurofeedback practitioner and biohacking coach for clients worldwide. At Peak Brain, Dr. Hill provides individualised training programs to help you optimize your brain across goals of stress, sleep, attention, brain fog, creativity, and athletic performance. (Note: Please make sure to check out Part 2 of this podcast -- which goes over my personal results, including the new brain map, after 20 sessions, so you see all my subjective and objective brain changes from neurofeedback training. You can listen to that episode here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlQBekuYtpU ) In this episode (part 1), we talk about the following: What is neurofeedback? How can measuring things like brain waves and heart rate variability solve health problems, and help people reach their goals more easily? How effective has neurofeedback been shown to be for improving executive function, sleep regulation, stress response, reactions, and processing speed? How can neurofeedback help with medical problems such as chronic fatigue, stress-related exhaustion, autism, seizures, ADHD, and Parkinson's? How do nootropics and psychedelics overlap with the feedback this technology provides? Show Notes (00:00) Intro (17:16) How neurofeedback works (27:55) How Intention affects a neurofeedback session (33:28) The benefits of neurofeedback (41:27) Is neurofeedback worth the money? (47:43) An interpretation of Ari’s personal scans (1:02:08) How neurofeedback can help treat metabolic dysfunction (1:08:25) How Neurofeedback can help with fatigue (1:12:13) Supplements that complement neurofeedback (1:20:20) he latest ground-breaking research on the brain (Note: Again, please make sure to check out Part 2 of this podcast -- which goes over my personal results, including the new brain map, after 20 sessions, so you see all my subjective and objective brain changes from neurofeedback training. You can listen to that episode here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlQBekuYtpU ) 💻 RESOURCES MENTIONED IN THIS EPISODE: ▸ https://TheEnergyBlueprint.com 📌 Want even more tips? Subscribe to This Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnQo6oCvS6YuvaablyMT_sw?sub_confirmation=1 📖 FREE guide to help boost your energy: https://theenergyblueprint.com/top-science-backed-supplements-for-energy-brain-and-mood/ ABOUT ARI WHITTEN =================== The Founder of The Energy Blueprint is Ari Whitten, M.S. He is the best-selling author of "The Ultimate Guide To Red Light Therapy, and Eat For Energy: How To Beat Fatigue, and Supercharge Your Mitochondria For All-Day Energy." He’s a natural health expert who takes an evidence-based approach to human energy optimization. He has a Bachelor of Science in Kinesiology, certifications from the National Academy of Sports Medicine as a Corrective Exercise Specialist and Performance Enhancement Specialist, has extensive graduate-level training in Clinical Psychology, and holds a Master of Science degree in Human Nutrition and Functional Medicine. Ari is a tireless researcher who has obsessively devoted the last 25 years of his life to the pursuit of being on the cutting edge of the science on health and energy enhancement. He has deep expertise in mitochondrial health, circadian rhythm and sleep, nutrition, gut health, light therapies, fitness, and hormetic stress. For the last 8 years, he’s been developing the most comprehensive program in the world on the science of overcoming fatigue and increasing energy — The Energy Blueprint. Over 10,000 people have completed his flagship program, and over 2 million people have gone through his free courses and masterclasses, frequently with life-transforming results. ✉️ Business inquiries: support@theenergyblueprint.com 🖥️ Website: https://TheEnergyBlueprint.com __________ 👉🏻 Did you enjoy this video? Please share your thoughts and opinions in the comments below - we love hearing from you! Also, I appreciate it when you share these videos with your friends who are interested in boosting their energy and feeling healthy again, without resorting to drugs. #reducestress #stressrelief
Episode Summary
This conversation originally aired on The Energy Blueprint podcast with Ari Whitten. You can watch the original conversation. What follows is drawn from my own explanations and observations in that discussion, written up here in long form.
What is neurofeedback, and how does it actually work?
The thing we call neurofeedback today, called biofeedback for most of the past 50 or 60 years, is feedback on the central nervous system. It is a way of involuntarily exercising brain waves, and sometimes blood flow, so you can go after specific brain resources and tune them the way you might tune the body in physical therapy or strength training.
Here is the mechanism. The system measures a brain wave moment to moment as your brain produces it. Say we are watching theta over your right frontal cortex, a band we often want to train down for better executive function. Whenever your brain makes a bit less theta for half a second, the system applauds it with feedback. More puzzle pieces fill in, the car speeds up, a tone sounds. A couple of seconds later your brain drifts back the wrong direction, and the game slows or stops. The brain notices the contingency and adjusts.
This is operant conditioning. Think Skinner's pigeons rather than Pavlov's dog. Skinner worked out the basic rules of reinforcement learning: when something happens and the brain gets a reinforcer, it tends to do that thing more. The same shaping that builds a habit in a pigeon, or in a baby learning to crawl when a random muscle pattern suddenly lets it see ten feet further, is what you are running on a brain wave. The amount of theta is a thing your brain is already making and it fluctuates. The training rewards the fluctuations that move in the direction we want.
The trick that makes the brain figure out what is being asked of it is that we move the goalposts. Every 30 seconds or so the threshold adjusts, so it is the trend you are engaging, rather than any single event, that gets reinforced. During my doctoral work I built a 40-subject double-blind sham-controlled neurofeedback experiment, with a 64-channel cap layered on top of the training electrodes, specifically to look at how the brain reacts to this feedback and where the associative learning was coming from. The system parameterizes one of the billions of things your brain is doing, and the brain treats that as salient.
If you want the foundations, I cover the underlying learning process in more depth in SMR Neurofeedback: Train Sleep, Focus, and Self-Control and the broader evidence picture in Is Neurofeedback Legitimate? A Research Overview.
Does your intention during a session matter?
People want to know whether they should try hard, concentrate, or hold a particular mental state during training. If you look at the learning literature, you would expect expectation to increase learning. But this process was discovered in cats, who are poor instruction-followers. It works reliably in people who are non-verbal, who are unconscious, who are seizing, and in teenagers who sit on their phones and ignore the screen the entire session.
What intention can do is get in the way. When you tighten up, clench your jaw, or furrow your forehead to "concentrate," you add EMG, muscle-tension noise, to the measurement. In the flying game, people tense their forehead as the target approaches and the little plane drifts off, because they are trying to steer their brain with their body. Concentration also does a hundred things in your brain at once, rather than the one band shift at the one site we are working that day. You can notice the association between your state and the feedback, which many people eventually do. You usually cannot force it. You let it happen.
What does neurofeedback actually improve?
Across complaints, the average person tends to see improvements in four areas: executive function, sleep regulation, stress response, and speed of processing. What you experience depends on your starting point and your goals.
The conditions where the regulatory dynamics are the core feature respond best in the research. Attention, sleep, stress, and seizures all share regulatory dynamics. Any system that is dynamic and stable, whether weather, planets, or a nervous system, needs delay and feedback to create the oscillation that gives it dynamic range. You can think of depression as cortisol going up and staying up until the hippocampus suffers, or diabetes as insulin going up and staying up. Health requires dynamic range, and neurofeedback aims to rebuild it.
Anxiety is a useful example because it is a normal resource that has cramped up, like a muscle. The posterior cingulate does "watch the road, catch the Frisbee, heads up." When the brain has learned the world is unsafe, it over-resources that circuit and biases toward threat sensitivity, rumination, and a trauma response. The front midline, the anterior cingulate, has a failure mode in theta or in beta that produces obsessive, perseverative patterns. That same hot spot also tends to come with the CEO profile: highly focused, mind like a steel trap. The useful move is to look at how sleep, stress, mood, and attention actually run, then push those resources around rather than slap a diagnosis on yourself.
I go deeper on the anxiety circuits in Biohacking Anxiety: Targeting the Circuits That Won't Shut Up, and on the research base specifically for anxiety in Neurofeedback for Anxiety: What the Research Shows.
How were seizures and SMR the origin of all of this?
Dr. Barry Sterman at UCLA discovered this in the late 1960s. He was a learning scientist studying a brain wave that cats make. NASA gave him a small grant to study the toxicity of rocket fuel vapors, because astronauts were getting nauseated and developing headaches. He ran cats through exposure to hydrazine, the rocket-fuel monopropellant. Most of them showed a dose-dependent curve toward seizure and worse. A subset of the cats stayed stable far longer (Sterman et al., 1969).
The seizure-resistant cats turned out to be the same cats that, months earlier, he had reinforced for producing SMR, the sensorimotor rhythm. SMR sits on the motor strip, ear to ear, and is the idling rhythm of the sensory and motor system, like alpha for the motor cortex. It surges when you sit still, relax, become calm and self-controlled, and stay asleep. Every predator uses it to be alert and hold still at once. Picture the cat on the windowsill, body liquid, eyes locked. That is SMR running high. The opposite state is the brain that cannot sit still and is pulled by every novelty.
SMR raises the seizure threshold, and it maintains sleep. When you hear the dog barking three houses away and do not wake, that is SMR, what we call sleep spindles, bursts of 12 to 15 Hz, doing the work. Sterman's later clinical work extended the SMR finding from cats to people with epilepsy (Sterman & Friar, 1972). In his review of decades of seizure studies, most patients showed clinically meaningful reductions in seizures, with a meta-analytic follow-up confirming the effect across controlled studies (Tan et al., 2009). In the research on ADHD and executive function, neurofeedback shows medium-to-large effects on attention and impulsivity in meta-analysis (Arns et al., 2009). At Peak Brain, training thousands of people on attention and executive function, the effects I see are reliably large on attention assessment.
That score labeled "SMR" on your training screen is the category name for this whole family of neurofeedback. The full SMR detail is in SMR Neurofeedback, and the attention application is in Does Neurofeedback Work for ADHD?.
Why map the brain and test performance together?
We pair a full-cap QEEG with an attention test on purpose. Good scientific rigor looks for a double dissociation, physiology and performance moving against each other. The brain map is straightforward to read in terms of what brain waves you have, but less meaningful about what they mean for you, because people are idiosyncratic. So I treat the map as exploratory: model what could be true, then check it against what you already know about yourself. The attention test breaks performance down in a granular way that diagnostic language often misses.
Here is what that looks like in the data. On one map I reviewed, the person's response control, the ability to pump the brakes and not click impulsively, came in dead average at 103. Visual attention was fine at 98. But auditory attention was 64, two and a half standard deviations below the mean. Auditory reaction time was 80 milliseconds slower than visual, on a test where they usually run together. That is a local bottleneck inside one person.
On the map, there was low beta over the left auditory cortex behind the ear, the receptive-language region. The two auditory systems are like legs, built to be used in pairs, and the ears never turn off. When one runs sluggish, it is like a hard plastic tire on one wheel. You tap the gas and it spins before it grabs. In daily life that becomes a slow orient to the moment when someone starts talking from the next room. You registered the sound, and your brain had simply not yet committed attention to that channel. That is an auditory processing pattern, and it is trainable. It also distinguishes itself cleanly from the most common ADHD signature, which shows up as elevated theta relative to beta with the inattentive hit landing across alpha (Monastra et al., 1999).
If you want to understand what a map shows and how a session is read, see QEEG Brain Mapping: What It Is, What It Shows, and What to Expect and Biohacking with EEG Phenotypes: Predict Your Brain Function.
Can neurofeedback help when the problem starts in the body?
Metabolic and physiological hits show up in the brain as dysregulation of the slow waves, the deltas, alphas, and thetas. Delta is the heartbeat of the brain. When it is dysregulated, I see brain fog in the maps. Post-COVID I see a fairly clear signature in many people. It does not appear right away. It develops over a few months and looks like a concussion. COVID, chemo, mold, Lyme, sleep apnea, and the sleep disruption from PTSD are all metabolic hits, and they train well with neurofeedback.
When there is more metabolism involved, I bring in blood-flow training. We use hemoencephalography, an infrared camera on the forehead measuring the brain's metabolic outflux, the little waves of heat. Effort produces a surge of metabolism about two seconds later, the same delay you see in the fMRI BOLD signal. Unlike EEG, which is instantaneous and something you cannot consciously feel, blood flow is semi-voluntary and you can develop conscious control of it.
Neurofeedback may help these bottom-up problems from the top down in a few ways. Regulating disrupted sleep lets the whole system heal. You get a surge of plasticity after every session. Alpha training in the back midline is one approach people use for autoimmune and inflammatory issues. Central apnea, though not obstructive apnea, can respond. And training the brain trains the vagus nerve, which feeds the heart and gut. SMR training shifts heart rate variability, and HRV training shifts SMR, so you can work the system from either end. The large majority of vagal traffic is afferent, ascending from body to brain, so the body drives emotion (Berthoud & Neuhuber, 2000). For making large, durable changes, top-down dominates in my experience.
Acute gut dysregulation usually has to be addressed or it gets in the way. A colleague of mine who works with Parkinson's finds she cannot make change without regulating the gut first. Where the body is fighting back, changes do not stabilize, even though the initial shifts are still large.
For the brain fog mechanism specifically, see Biohacking Brain Fog: Restoring Mental Clarity. For the plasticity surge that follows training, see Biohacking Plasticity: Unlock Your Brain's Adaptive Potential.
What about fatigue, energy, and chronic stress?
With chronic fatigue, stress-related exhaustion, and chronic fatigue syndrome, the underlying picture is lost dynamic range. When you cannot get all the way down into rest or all the way up into wakefulness, those states bleed into each other. Low beta on the left frontal region often means you are not fully waking or fully sleeping. Rebuilding that range, plus better sleep regulation, tends to dissolve the fog and the fatigue, as long as there is no active new insult, a fresh mold exposure, a new viral hit, driving it.
The benefits creep outward. The first time you got in shape at the gym, three weeks in you noticed your balance and how your body felt walking down the street. The same thing happens when you change your stress response, how fast your mind works, how much you can hold in mind without feeling stressed. People come in calmer under pressure, juggling chaos with an even physiology that was not there before. That resilience, the inhibitory tone that lets you sit on your automatic reactivity, is one of the most consistent things I see emerge in the data.
Sleep is foundational to all of it. The minimum-viable circadian moves still apply: lock your wake time seven days a week and keep it early, get morning light, do low-intensity movement first thing to burn off cortisol rather than high-intensity work that worsens cortisol and insulin resistance, and stop eating before bed. I cover these in Biohacking Sleep and Biohacking Your Morning: The Minimum Viable Practice for Circadian Health.
Do nootropics, peptides, and psychedelics pair with neurofeedback?
I tend to change the whole system first with training, then dial in a nootropic strategy on top, because the spot-treatment value of a supplement is more subtle once the big resources have moved. I split nootropics into two buckets: anti-aging and long-term support, versus spot use to backfill a specific difficulty.
On peptides and research chemicals, my threshold for risk is high. If you are optimizing an already-functional system rather than addressing real suffering, only go after things unlikely to cause trouble. The sourcing on most peptides is unreliable, and many of the cognition-promising compounds were pulled years ago after odd cancer results in rats. I watch people get into trouble with random peptides and with dopamine-active compounds like kratom and tianeptine, often because they read "it's GABAergic" on a website and conclude they have found their problem.
The popular idea that mood is set simply by neurotransmitter levels has weak support in the research. Serotonin is tied to anxiety and sexual function more than depression, and the simple chemical-imbalance account of depression does not hold up under review (Moncrieff et al., 2022). Anything that lifts depression, an SSRI, therapy, or exercise, appears to work through a final common pathway of raised plasticity, with BDNF and hippocampal neurogenesis implicated (Duman & Monteggia, 2006). In Parkinson's you lose the large majority of your dopamine before tremor or cognitive symptoms appear. The system is dynamic and tunes around the absolute level of any chemical through receptor density, sensitization, and recurrent connectivity. By the time you see symptoms, you are watching the system fall over, not a tidy imbalance.
If you want to test your own response empirically, that is the honest way to do it. People with a standing brain map come back and map themselves on and off a compound and see what it actually did to their EEG, rather than trusting the general claim.
Is at-home neurofeedback as good as a clinic?
The consumer one-size-fits-all devices have a real problem: the technology is not great, the training is barely tailored, and they are not meaningfully cheaper. At Peak Brain we run home training with the same software and hardware as the office, with live coaches who teach setup and check electrode placement, and an open support channel seven days a week. About three quarters of our clients never visit an office. We map remotely.
The hard part of neurofeedback is the setup and execution, and a coach standing by solves that. The other hard part is telling us what changed so we can fine-tune the protocol, and that loop matters whether you are home or in an office. Home training tends to stack better because it is convenient. People get 50 sessions done in three months, try more, and learn what they are doing. The consumer devices solved the delivery of hardware without solving the actual neurofeedback.
You can read more about how remote training is run in Remote Neurofeedback: How It Works and What to Expect, and on what it costs in How Much Does Neurofeedback Cost in 2026?.
What to take away
Neurofeedback shapes brain waves you are already producing, using reinforcement learning to rebuild the dynamic range that stress, poor sleep, attention problems, and metabolic hits erode. Three to four months of consistent training is a large dose for the brain, which remodels faster than the body. The honest starting point is a brain map paired with a performance test, read against what you already know about yourself. From there you choose what you want to optimize, watch whether it changes, and remap every other month to confirm a new baseline.
References
- Sterman (1972). Suppression of seizures in an epileptic following sensorimotor EEG feedback training. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(72)90028-4
- Tan (2009). Meta-Analysis of EEG Biofeedback in Treating Epilepsy. doi:10.1177/155005940904000310
- Arns (2009). Efficacy of Neurofeedback Treatment in ADHD: The Effects on Inattention, Impulsivity and Hyperactivity: A Meta-Analysis. doi:10.1177/155005940904000311
- Berthoud (2000). Functional and chemical anatomy of the afferent vagal system. doi:10.1016/s1566-0702(00)00215-0
- Moncrieff (2022). The serotonin theory of depression: a systematic umbrella review of the evidence. doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01661-0