☀️ Free masterclass to double your energy👉 https://www.theenergyblueprint.com/masterclass/ Why Neurofeedback Therapy is the #1 Brain Hack (part 2). If you haven't already, make sure to check out part 1 of this podcast with Dr. Andrew Hill, which goes over the initial results of my brain map prior to starting neurofeedback. This episode -- part 2 -- goes over my second brain map which we did after 20 sessions, and all the objective brain changes that resulted from the neurofeedback training, along with all my subjective improvements. You can find part 1 here: https://youtu.be/SefLxshFMkc Claim your discount here: https://theenergyblueprint.com/neurofeedback Transcript: https://theenergyblueprint.com/neurofeedback-2 In this episode, I am speaking with Dr. Andrew Hill who works in Cognitive Neuroscience, at UCLA and is the founder of Peak Brain Institute and a leading neurofeedback practitioner and biohacking coach for clients worldwide. At Peak Brain, Dr. Hill provides individualized training programs to help you optimize your brain across goals of stress, sleep, attention, brain fog, creativity, and athletic performance. We will talk about how using neurofeedback can boost brain performance. What retesting after 20 sessions of biofeedback revealed about how Ari's brain’s performance has changed - and what practical difference this has made to Ari's life To what extent Dr. Hill’s research and experience can validate other (binaural) forms of brain training How does this kind of training differ from classic meditation? How fast can someone normally expect to see improvements with this technology? Other lifestyle factors that can make a massive contribution to brain health Why neurofeedback is the #1 brain hack in existence 🕒 In this episode: (00:00) Intro (01:48) Ari’s results of neurofeedback (45:15) Dr. Hill’s take on binaural beats and isochronic tones (49:50) Dr. Hill’s favorite nootropics (52:17) How meditation may affect brain waves (1:13:13) Why Dr. Hill focuses on performance over therapy (1:19:00) How neurofeedback works for ADHD and PTSD 💻 RESOURCES MENTIONED IN THIS EPISODE: ▸ https://TheEnergyBlueprint.com 📌 Want even more tips? Subscribe to This Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnQo6oCvS6YuvaablyMT_sw?sub_confirmation=1 📖 FREE guide to help boost your energy: https://theenergyblueprint.com/top-science-backed-supplements-for-energy-brain-and-mood/ ABOUT ARI WHITTEN =================== The Founder of The Energy Blueprint is Ari Whitten, M.S. He is the best-selling author of "The Ultimate Guide To Red Light Therapy, and Eat For Energy: How To Beat Fatigue, and Supercharge Your Mitochondria For All-Day Energy." He’s a natural health expert who takes an evidence-based approach to human energy optimization. He has a Bachelor of Science in Kinesiology, certifications from the National Academy of Sports Medicine as a Corrective Exercise Specialist and Performance Enhancement Specialist, has extensive graduate-level training in Clinical Psychology, and holds a Master of Science degree in Human Nutrition and Functional Medicine. Ari is a tireless researcher who has obsessively devoted the last 25 years of his life to the pursuit of being on the cutting edge of the science on health and energy enhancement. He has deep expertise in mitochondrial health, circadian rhythm and sleep, nutrition, gut health, light therapies, fitness, and hormetic stress. For the last 8 years, he’s been developing the most comprehensive program in the world on the science of overcoming fatigue and increasing energy — The Energy Blueprint. Over 10,000 people have completed his flagship program, and over 2 million people have gone through his free courses and masterclasses, frequently with life-transforming results. ✉️ Business inquiries: support@theenergyblueprint.com 🖥️ Website: https://TheEnergyBlueprint.com __________ 👉🏻 Did you enjoy this video? Please share your thoughts and opinions in the comments below - we love hearing from you! Also, I appreciate it when you share these videos with your friends who are interested in boosting their energy and feeling healthy again, without resorting to drugs.
Episode Summary
This piece is drawn from a conversation I had on Ari Whitten's podcast The Energy Blueprint, where we sat down to review a real brain map before and after a course of neurofeedback. You can watch the original conversation. The client whose data we discuss is the host himself, who agreed to share it publicly. I am writing here in my own voice, pulling out the science and the observations from that discussion.
What does a brain map actually measure?
We work with two kinds of data, and they answer different questions.
The first is resting brain activity, captured with QEEG. You sit with your eyes closed, then eyes open, while we record a few minutes of EEG at each scalp site. I joke that eyes-closed is your first album and eyes-open is the jazz record. Eyes-closed data is cleaner, because opening your eyes loads the visual system and tightens the forehead, so it is harder to read across people. The resting map picks up your traits. It looks the same day after day. It is the fingerprint of how your brain idles. If you want the full walkthrough of what those colored circles mean, see QEEG Brain Mapping: What It Is, What It Shows, and What to Expect.
The second is a performance test: a deliberately boring 20-minute task where you click on a "one" and withhold on a "two," in both auditory and visual channels. There is nothing to push against, so it unloads your attention resources steadily. You cannot practice your way to a better score by trying harder. This test picks up state. If you are tired, stressed, or burned out that day, it shows up here, not on the resting map.
Scores run on a bell curve. One hundred is roughly average for an age-matched sample, with about 15 points per standard deviation. Two-thirds of people land in the typical band.
What changed after 20 neurofeedback sessions?
On the first map, response control (the ability to pump the brakes and not click the distractor) was already typical, around 100. The interesting deficit was on the attention side: the ability to grab and hold onto information.
Visual attention was fine, sitting right in the middle of the curve. Auditory attention was the bottleneck, running about two and a half standard deviations below the mean. The specific problem was vigilance, the moment of catching information as it changes. Auditory vigilance came in at 58.
After roughly 20 to 24 sessions, vigilance went from 58 to 105. That is a 47-point jump, more than three standard deviations. I consider one standard deviation of change a normal dose from a round of 20 to 25 sessions. Three is a large change for that window.
Other numbers moved with it. The gross auditory bottleneck went from 56 to 105. Focus (the tolerance for boring, repetitive trials) went from 79 to 97. Auditory speed went from 89 to 123. The sustained auditory trend across time went from 69 to 110. The overall gross attention score rose from 79 to 107.
The honest read on the new pattern: the bottleneck is gone, but the attention system now shows a slightly inefficient profile, quick and alert, using speed and vigilance to catch information it is about to miss. That is a compensatory strategy. We took resources that were cramped and flagging, brought them up to typical, and now the work is making them efficient rather than just strong. If you want the deeper picture of how attention sits on a spectrum rather than as an on-off diagnosis, see Biohacking with EEG Phenotypes.
How does the brain map line up with how someone feels?
Beautiful data does not matter if nothing changed in the person.
The reported changes tracked the hypotheses. Improved resilience, better extended concentration, and a clear lift in mood and motivation over the prior few weeks. I find that timing interesting, because we had recently shifted the training toward an area that tends to support flow.
The mechanism behind the auditory deficit was visible in the map. On eyes-closed data, one auditory region was failing to produce Delta, the slow waves that let tissue shut off and rest. Only one side of a paired auditory system was stuck in always-on mode. Picture driving with a plastic spare on one front wheel: you tap the gas and that wheel spins because it lacks traction. When the brain asked both auditory regions to activate together, the mismatched side produced a tiny lag in alerting. That lag is the vigilance hit on the performance test.
The training record matched the story. The provider had run protocols at C3 on the left for sleep maintenance and focus, C4 on the right for executive function, then a chunk of temporal-lobe work (T3, T4, T5, T6) targeting the auditory outlier. The outlier lifted by about a standard deviation. The map still looks like the same brain, because it would have looked the same in two months without training. That stability is the point. The fingerprint stays; the cramped regions release.
What were the cingulates doing?
Two midline structures showed up as hot, running fast beta with too little Alpha and Delta to relax them.
The anterior cingulate, the front midline, helps you hold what you are thinking about. When it cramps, you get perseveration: songs stuck in your head, OCD-flavored loops, nail-biting, ticking. The posterior cingulate, the back midline, orients you in the world. When it cramps, you get a visceral, gut-level stuckness: threat sensitivity, worry, rumination.
We ran midline protocols (FZ in front, PZ in back) to bring up neutral Alpha and let those circuits unclench. We brought up the neutrals so the brain could learn to shut the high-gear circuits off on its own. Both regions shifted one to two standard deviations.
The posterior cingulate change was the one that resonated most for the host. He had spent two years in an environment with real, ongoing danger: home break-ins, dangerous roads, big surf with strong rip currents. His brain learned the world was unpredictable and over-resourced threat detection. That is adaptation to genuine risk. The cost is a nervous system that cannot stop scanning, that struggles to relax even when the threat is gone. After training, he described staying calm during a near-collision in the surf with his wife, then staying calm afterward. The hyper-vigilance had loosened its grip. For more on this circuit and how it gets stuck, see Biohacking Anxiety: Targeting the Circuits That Won't Shut Up and Biohacking Fight or Flight.
What does Alpha speed tell you about processing and mood?
The speed of the dominant Alpha rhythm tracks how fast you think and how tired you are. In your natural range it correlates fairly well with cognitive ability (Klimesch, 1999). When Alpha runs slow and spreads out, the gears do not mesh, and the neutral modes between brain regions struggle to synchronize when they relax.
Two complaints come with slow, draggy Alpha. Word-finding and delayed recall: your processing speed reaches for a name or an idea slowly enough that the information decays before you grab it, so you get tip-of-the-tongue moments. Low motivation and difficulty finding joy: the brain is too slow to summon the "yes, I want that, let me engage" response.
On this map Alpha speed moved from roughly negative 0.5 to positive 0.5, which fits the reported lift in joy, fluidity, and engagement. The full discussion of this band is in Decoding Alpha Waves: Your Brain's Idle and Its Brakes.
The deep-sleep signal still lagged. Negative Delta on both maps suggests deep-sleep architecture was not great, partly because the brain does not fully let go and bounces off deep sleep. A sleep tracker will report two hours of deep sleep when much of it was lighter than that. The practical fixes here are unglamorous: lock your wake time early seven days a week, get active in a low-key way after waking, stop eating before bed so insulin drops and growth hormone can release in sleep, and block light at the source. See Biohacking Sleep for the full protocol.
Do binaural beats and isochronic tones work?
For the most part, no. Driving brain rhythms with beats of light or sound requires a frequency-following response, where the brain picks up the external beat and resonates with it. As far as we can tell, that response does not reliably exist in humans for these tools.
I ran a double-blind, placebo-controlled study on binaural beats in grad school at UCLA. I matched the audio characteristics, then collapsed some to mono to strip out the binaural quality as a placebo. I measured attention, resting EEG, and evoked potentials, every standard cognitive neuroscience measure that would catch a real resource shift. Nothing moved. There is some recent work on light-sensitive neurons that may open other avenues, but the consumer products claiming to entrain your Alpha or Theta mostly do not.
What about the very high-coherence brain maps you sometimes see?
Hyper-coherence everywhere, lit up red across the whole head, is almost never a high-performance state. The easiest way to produce coherence that looks identical at every site is to clench your jaw and flood the recording with muscle tension. When that is not artifact, it is over-activation: over-arousal, anxiety, fatigue, stress. Any brain wave hyper-coupled everywhere is an unhealthy adaptation to something extreme.
A genuine example: one of my clients had been drinking heavily for 25 years, a bottle and a half of wine a day plus Ambien and Ativan. At 45 days sober he was hyper-coherent in beta and could not produce Delta at all. His brain had no chill. After SMR training and a course of Alpha-Theta, within 10 weeks he could fall asleep at will, no medication, deeply relaxed. The hyper-coherence had normalized.
If you see a presentation claiming a map is "150 standard deviations above normal" and framing that as a superior state, be skeptical. Extreme outliers almost always mean something is getting in the way. Long-term meditators do show increased gamma coherence over years (Lutz et al., 2004), but that is a modest, real effect, and gamma is genuinely hard to measure outside of high-end research labs. A real-time state change in one person, on one map, does not support a conclusion about an optimal brain.
How is neurofeedback different from meditation?
Meditation, in the vipassana sense, is paying attention in a particular way on purpose, replacing judgment with curiosity. You pick an anchor, hold it, get distracted, and re-anchor. That is executive-function training, not relaxation training, which is what people most often get wrong about it. The act of anchoring is what matters more than the specific flavor. Twenty minutes a day builds real circuits, and the long-term work shows it can sidestep some of the usual trajectory of brain aging (Lazar et al., 2005). More on the mechanisms in Biohacking Meditation and Mindfulness: Don't Just Do Something, Sit There.
Neurofeedback reaches some of the same circuits, but it works differently in three ways.
The loop is inverted. You are rewarded for things your brain already did, rather than trying to do something. It is involuntary exercise. Alpha-Theta will push your brain around even if you are unconscious or trying nothing. The technique was discovered in cats 60 years ago (Sterman & Friar, 1972), and cats are poor instruction-followers. It works on people in comas and on kids who do not want to be there.
It can train things you cannot feel. Executive function and heart-rate variability are things you can sense and practice. Most of what your brain does, you cannot feel: the cingulate stuck in high gear, the residue of a concussion, the signature of PTSD. Neurofeedback can reach those.
It uses operant conditioning. We reward small trends the brain is already producing and ignore the billions of other things it is doing. The brain notices that dropping its Theta makes the screen move, and starts doing it. After several sessions it associates the new state with reward. We move the goalposts as it improves. This is the same Hebbian, neurons-that-fire-together logic as practice, which is why stacking neurofeedback with meditation tends to multiply results. When you combine three or more interventions in a transformation, the odds of large, discontinuous change climb, partly because neurofeedback may raise background plasticity for a period after every session. See Biohacking Plasticity.
What is Alpha-Theta training?
Alpha-Theta is eyes-closed training at the hypnagogic edge between awake and asleep. It lets the monkey mind drop away and lets Theta, the insight and awareness band, surge. People do visualization and insight work, and it often releases deep stress. It can also exacerbate stress in someone who is too spacey or activated to start with, which is why timing matters and why it should not be the first protocol for everyone.
It is aggressive, so you do not run it every session, the same way you do not deadlift every day. Two or three sessions in one direction, then cross-train into something else, then back.
What conditions does neurofeedback help, and how fast?
I work from a performance and optimization frame rather than a therapy frame. Drop below the diagnostic label to the physiology, and you are talking about real resources: attention, sleep, stress, executive function. These sit on a spectrum. You can train them up even from typical.
The gross resources tend to change reliably, on the order of one standard deviation every other month, every 20 to 25 sessions. Two rounds of that usually produces a relatively durable change. The case in this conversation moved about twice that fast, which is faster than average.
A typical program is 10 to 16 weeks. Severe ADHD, severe PTSD, and serious brain fog tend to shift about two standard deviations in three months. We take significant suffering and make it hard to diagnose at the end of the window, and the change is relatively stable because the brain has been practicing those modes daily. For the ADHD evidence base specifically, see Does Neurofeedback Work for ADHD? and SMR Neurofeedback. For the anxiety literature, see Neurofeedback for Anxiety.
For ADHD, gains past 40 sessions appear to be fairly durable; randomized work finds neurofeedback effects on inattention holding at follow-up (Van Doren et al., 2019). For PTSD it is more complex, because the person is more than their symptoms. We can pull the teeth of the over-activated cingulate fairly durably, which often means sleeping well and moving back home, without claiming the trauma is fully resolved. There is a controlled trial showing benefit in chronic PTSD (van der Kolk et al., 2016). I have seen this with veterans and, in the last few years, with frontline medical staff carrying chronic, unending threat load. ADHD runs on a set of natural circuits. Anxiety reflects resources that have spasmed, and they tend to stretch back out.
What should you do before reaching for the big guns?
Neurofeedback is the most powerful tool I know for moving the brain quickly and thoroughly, and I would be glad if you tried it. Your brain is changeable, and you have accessible levers before you spend on training.
Fix your sleep first: aim for seven hours of quality rest, lock your wake time, get morning light and movement. Manage insulin and blood sugar. I am seeing a large amount of post-COVID brain that looks and feels like a concussion, and it correlates with inflammation, oxidation, and hyperinsulinemia. If you are insulin-resistant, address that and your sleep before spending a year and several thousand dollars on training, because those foundations will make a bigger difference. Strategic time-restricted eating and circadian alignment are tools everyone can use; see Strategic Fasting and Biohacking Your Morning.
When you want to cut your seizures in half, get control of a drinking problem, or remediate trauma alongside a therapist you trust, that is when neurofeedback earns its place. On cost and access, see How Much Does Neurofeedback Cost and Is Neurofeedback Covered by Insurance?.
Neurofeedback is personal training for the brain. You get an effect, you validate it against how you feel, and you adjust the next round. Start by mapping your brain and finding out what your resources are actually doing, and the plan follows your goals from there.
References
- Klimesch (1999). EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00056-3
- Lutz (2004). Long-term meditators self-induce high-amplitude gamma synchrony during mental practice. doi:10.1073/pnas.0407401101
- Lazar (2005). Meditation experience is associated with increased cortical thickness. doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000186598.66243.19
- Sterman (1972). Suppression of seizures in an epileptic following sensorimotor EEG feedback training. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(72)90028-4
- Van (2019). Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. doi:10.1007/s00787-018-1121-4
- Kolk (2016). A Randomized Controlled Study of Neurofeedback for Chronic PTSD. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166752