Book your free strategy call with me here: https://letsmeet.io/adelitamontero/free-strategy-call Follow me on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/adelitalive Find me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/adelitalive/ Visit me on the Web: https://adelitamonterolive.com/contact THANKS FOR WATCHING. PLEASE SUBSCRIBE. ABOUT ADELITA MONTERO Adelita is a 4x jiu-jitsu world champion, clinical mental health counselor, certified clinical hypnotherapist, and neurofeedback technician. Adelita works with high-performing entrepreneurs, corporate leaders, and athletes who struggle with unresourceful emotional and mental states causing them to fall short of reaching their goals. Adelita guides individuals and teams in developing a warrior-champion mindset for maximizing results and creating more freedom & success. As a world-class athlete, Adelita teaches the proven techniques & tools used in developing her own winning strategies for success on the mats and in life. SHOUT OUT to @Bioptimizers's line of NOOTROPICS for cognitive and performance enhancement supplementation: NOOTOPIA NOOTOPIA -- https://nootopia.com/sp Discount Code: ADELITALIVE123 BIOPTIMIZERs -- https://bit.ly/31OvjEj. Discount Code: ADELITALIVE123 ABOUT Dr. HILL ANDREW HILL, PHD Founding Director and Lead Neurotherapist Dr. Hill is one of the top peak performance coaches in the country. He holds a Ph.D. in Cognitive Neuroscience from UCLA’s Department of Psychology and continues to do research on attention and cognition. Research methodology includes EEG, QEEG, and ERP. He has been practicing neurofeedback since 2003. In addition to founding Peak Brain Institute, Dr. Hill is the host of the Head First Podcast with Dr. Hill and lectures at UCLA, teaching courses in psychology, neuroscience, and gerontology. https://peakbraininstitute.com PEAK BRAIN Book your qEEG with my code: ADELITA to receive a $250 off discount. DISCLAIMER: Any information or advice I give is purely based on my own experience and research. This content is meant for educational purposes. If you have a severe medical or psychological condition, consult a qualified professional in your area. #neuroscience #neurofeedback #biohacking #biofeedback #hypnosis #clinicalpsychology #jiujitsu #psychology #biofeedback #psychophysiology #martialarts #anxiety #stress #mapofconsciousness #emotions #depression #fear #mindset #championmindset #loseweight #achievegoals #goalsetting #smartgoals #mindsetcoach #entrepreneur #lifecoach #loseweight #fatloss #musclegain #mentaltraining #champion #healing #gratitute #love #joy
Episode Summary
I sat down with Adelita Montero on the Adelita Montero, MA, AMFT, BCN-P Psychology Podcast to walk through what neurofeedback actually is, what a brain map shows, and what changed in her own data after twenty sessions of training. You can watch the original conversation. Here is the substance of what I shared, in my own words.
What is neurofeedback, and how did I get into it?
I have a PhD in cognitive neuroscience from UCLA's Department of Psychology, and I have been working with brains for about thirty years. Before grad school I worked across health and human services with inpatient developmental disability, drug addiction, aging, and child crisis work. I came to neuroscience to answer a specific question: how does neurofeedback actually work? When I started in 2005, the field had several schools of thought, all of them with good results, none of them reconcilable. Something was missing.
For my dissertation I ran one of the first placebo-controlled, double-blind studies of neurofeedback, looking at how the brain binds to feedback information in real time. The question was whether you could establish a genuine learning loop between a brain and a computer, and whether that loop moves the brain. That methodology, around 2009 and 2010, was the first time you could do double-blind placebo-controlled work in EEG. That matters for how we read the research, which I will come back to.
After UCLA I moved out of the academic route and into coaching and entrepreneurship. I helped start a nootropic company, then opened a brain and addiction center in Beverly Hills, and the brain side grew into Peak Brain Institute, where I have read brain maps for about 14 years, with locations in Culver City, Orange County, New York City, St. Louis, and overseas partners. We also work with remote clients all over the world.
Is neurofeedback closer to medicine or to personal training?
I call what I do functional neuroscience, and the right comparison is personal training, not medicine and not psychology. It borrows tools from all three, but the work is iterative, goal-focused, and measured, and you do it to yourself with guidance. My role is coach and scientist, not clinician. I am not running transference the way a psychotherapist does, and I am not the expert with the one right answer the way your physician needs to be. I want to demystify the brain so you can understand yourself, decide on a target, push the brain around, transform it, and measure again.
Training the brain works a lot like rehabbing a shoulder or drilling a new technique until it becomes second nature. It is iterative and progressive, and your resources change. It is not a voluntary process the way a bicep curl is, but the loop is the same: target a metric, make an intervention, measure, iterate. We also coach a lot of bottom-up work, hacking the body to support the brain, including the sleep cycle, macronutrient and food timing, ketones, and the broader biohacking toolkit.
What does a QEEG brain map actually show?
We start with QEEG brain mapping, a quantitative EEG. You wear a cap, we fill it with gel, it is painless if a little annoying, and you come in uncaffeinated for a clean baseline. After that you can map caffeinated, on Adderall, on cannabis, on pre-workout, whatever you want, and you see how each one moves your brain. It is like having a good lipid panel and watching your triglycerides change with your Ben and Jerry's habit. You get control because you can go after a metric and measure it.
A map is not diagnostically precise. I cannot say "this circle means that disease." I can say you are different from average in a specific way, then build a plausible reason for it, tell you what is often true for that pattern in the research, and check it against what you actually experience. Slow brainwaves, the deltas and thetas, show up in orange on the left columns of the display. Slow waves are where deep sleep, metabolism, and life maintenance live. The fast beta waves are the mind. Green circles mean typical. Red lines mean overconnection, where regions are locked together and not letting go.
To frame the hypotheses I cheat a little and add a continuous performance test. The computer presents ones and twos, and your job is to click for the one and resist the two. The left side scores attention, how well you activate and grab a target. The right side scores response control, how well you pump the brakes and resist clicking. That separates a real attention pattern from sleep, anxiety, or a concussion masquerading as one.
How do we read a real set of results?
Adelita let me show her data live, so here is the reasoning.
Her baseline showed a lot of delta and some theta behind both ears, especially the right, sitting about two and a half standard deviations above typical, with red lines showing the delta was overconnected and stuck. On the performance test, her overall auditory score was 72 percent, roughly two standard deviations off the mean. Her visual system sat in the 90s. That contrast matters. A spacey, global attention problem would drag both systems down. This was specific to the auditory channel.
Drilling further, her auditory speed was 98 and her focus was 92, both fine. Her vigilance, the ability to grab something when it changes gears, was 48, three to four standard deviations off the mean. That is the kind of pattern where you are a beat late with auditory input, you say "sorry, what was that" to your partner, and a boring lecture at the end of a tired day is brutal. It would not touch her on the mat, where she uses visual, proprioceptive, and deeply learned premotor skills, but it shows up in daily listening.
Behind the right ear I also saw hot beta at the temporoparietal junction. That region is a junction box for bringing sensory information in. When beta runs high there, filtering breaks down, and a siren six blocks away or a dog two houses over gets in when nobody else is bothered. I call that the princess and the pea marker. So she had two opposite auditory problems at once: sluggish automatic grabbing, and poor filtering. Brain fog, tinnitus, and balance issues all sit near that same territory, so those are the questions I ask to confirm the hypothesis.
The hot, hyper-coherent beta across the rest of the head is a different story. When everything is connected to everything at once and the beta will not let go, the common experience is generalized stress with poor sleep maintenance. You wake easily, you do not fall back asleep, and you run a little on edge. Psychologists would call that generalized anxiety with a sleep disturbance. I see it constantly in fast, capable brains. When you run that fast you tend to get brilliance and anxiety at the same time, and your comfort tracks how much control you keep over it.
What changed after twenty sessions of training?
We mapped Adelita again at about twenty sessions. Behind the right ear, where she had been making enormous amounts of delta, only a shadow remained. She moved roughly two standard deviations in the delta and about two to two and a half in the theta, and the red overconnection lines dropped away. On the performance test, her overall auditory score went from 72 to 99, about two standard deviations of improvement in six to eight weeks. The vigilance score, the acute bottleneck, went from 48 to 108, which is half a standard deviation above average. That is roughly four standard deviations of change in the worst feature.
What she noticed matched the data. She reported being more present with her partner and more emotionally regulated. The improved emotional regulation is the beta change. Her foot came off the gas pedal of her emotions. The improved listening is the auditory change. The point of the second map is to close the loop between the data, the mechanism, and the lived experience.
The delta behind the ear was probably an old, mild injury given her sport, though I never assume that, because fog all looks the same on a map. A concussion, COVID, chemotherapy, mold, Lyme, apnea, and chronic stress with PTSD wrecking sleep can all read as the same foggy delta. The cause does not change how I train it, and your brain has no sensory nerve endings, so you never feel the wear and tear directly. You can only see it on the map.
How does the training itself work?
We tie a game to your brainwaves. If the target is to bring down theta and bring up beta on the right, we place a wire there, measure those bands, and whenever your brain moves in the right direction for about half a second, the game advances. The mechanism is operant conditioning: the software rewards what is already happening so it happens more often. You sit and watch something like a video game without a controller, and your brain gradually recalibrates toward the rewarded state.
The change tends to feel like something. Some sessions leave you wired with too much energy, some leave you too calm, some make it hard to stay awake. When Adelita could not keep her eyes open during beta training, that was a frequency too high for what she was used to, the equivalent of putting too much weight on the bar. We back off the beta frequency a notch and within minutes it feels better. Push through and you often wake up with fresh energy a couple of hours later, like a hard workout that leaves you loose and chatty afterward. The coaches track your subjective sleep, stress, and attention every twenty-four hours and tune the next set of workouts. You can read more about that specific frequency in SMR neurofeedback and the role of alpha waves.
Who is neurofeedback for?
We tend to see three groups. The first is classic neurofeedback work: autism, ADHD, seizures, migraines, concussions, childhood development, brain injury, and alcohol cravings. These are high-impact targets. The second group is people whose ordinary stress, sleep problems, or old trauma history has gotten badly in the way, and who want to optimize the whole person. The third group is peak performers: musicians, athletes, actors, creatives, and high-level CEOs trying to squeeze out more or shift from linear into creative mode so they stop being a jerk to their partner when they get home.
Neurofeedback grew out of work at UCLA in the late 1960s, where Barry Sterman trained sensorimotor rhythm in cats and later found it raised seizure thresholds (Sterman & Friar, 1972), and cats are terrible instruction followers. That is the point. It is an involuntary exercise that works whether or not you want it to, which is why it has been applied to people in comas, nonverbal patients, and reluctant teenagers.
There is a related lesson here about labels. People come in with an ADHD diagnosis, and when I look at the brain and the performance, I often see a large sleep problem, an anxiety pattern, or a concussion instead. You can drop below the label and look at the physiology directly. When someone sees a small injury on one side, or sees the front midline marker for obsession and the back midline marker for threat sensitivity, their relationship with their own brain often shifts in the room. It stops being a character flaw and becomes a natural resource that is cramped, like a muscle that spasmed. That moves people from shame toward function.
What does the research actually say?
The literature has tons of papers, and most of them have problems. There is no real uniformity in equipment or protocols, so comparing studies is apples and oranges. The deeper issue is that neurofeedback works best individualized to each person and adjusted as you go, and that is the opposite of how a clean group study is usually run, where you do one fixed thing to everyone. Add to that the fact that placebo-controlled, double-blind EEG methodology only became possible around 2009 and 2010, and you have a young evidence base for a fifty-year-old field. In ADHD specifically, when standardized protocols are followed, controlled trials report medium-to-large effects on inattention that hold up at follow-up (Arns et al., 2009; Arns et al., 2014). For decades, insurance incentives kept neurofeedback in a fringe space.
The picture is changing. When I started grad school, saying "neurofeedback" too often made serious scientists' eyes roll, the way "consciousness" did in the 1960s. By the end of my program, senior researchers wanted to collaborate. If you want a fuller treatment, see is neurofeedback legitimate and what the research shows for anxiety.
How to get started
If you have goals around sleep, attention, executive function, mood, or stress, the first step is a brain map. You see your own data, there is no guesswork about whether something is landing, and you can use the map to test your nootropics, your sleep depth, and your other interventions over a few months as your brain picks up the changes. Book a free call through Peak Brain Institute, or visit one of the offices in Los Angeles, Orange County, St. Louis, or New York. Listeners who came through Adelita's podcast can join the club at half price, which gives you unlimited baseline brain map recordings within reason plus consults to dig into your data. From there, most people get equipment and train with our coaches.
Get the map first. The map turns a vague sense that something is off into a specific, measurable target you can train.
References
- Sterman (1972). Suppression of seizures in an epileptic following sensorimotor EEG feedback training. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(72)90028-4
- Arns (2014). Neurofeedback in ADHD and insomnia: Vigilance stabilization through sleep spindles and circadian networks. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.10.006