Make sure not to miss the great offers in Biohacker's summer sale! Check it out: https://biohackercenter.com/ QEEG or EEG Brain Mapping is an assessment tool used to generate hypotheses and identify likely performance bottlenecks in the brain. This presentation will give an overview of how QEEG can be used, the history and some limits on QEEG, and how to identify features in the brain that are most likely to improve performance when addressed. Dr. Andrew Hill is one of the top peak performance coaches in the world. He holds a PhD in Cognitive Neuroscience from UCLA’s department of Psychology and researches attention, cognitive performance, and peak aging. Dr. Hill is the founder of Peak Brain Institute, host of the Head First Podcast, Lead Neuroscientist at truBrain, and a UCLA Lecturer teaching courses in psychology, neuroscience, and gerontology. This presentation was filmed during Biohacker Summit Stockholm in May 2018. Check https://biohackersummit.com for upcoming events & tickets!
Episode Summary
I gave this talk at the HOLOLIFE Summit (Biohacker Summit) in Stockholm, walking through how I read brains and how I work with them. You can watch the original conversation. Here is the substance of what I covered, in my own words.
Why I Stopped Asking "What's Broken?"
When most people think about how the brain works, they reach for diagnostic labels. They want to know which bucket their problem fits into. I find that frame less useful, especially if your goal is peak performance rather than disease management.
The better question is where your resources bottleneck. Even high performers have afternoons that burn out, nights of bad sleep, days when creativity and flexibility drop off after a long flight or a short night. Those are resource problems, not character problems. QEEG brain mapping lets me find where the bottleneck sits, and neurofeedback can help ease it.
What Is EEG, and What Makes It "Quantitative"?
EEG is brain waves. Your cortex folds into sulci and gyri to pack more surface area against the skull, and the cells sit in columns at right angles to the scalp. That geometry lets us read their electrical activity from outside the head. You do not need a bald scalp. Those of us without hair actually produce noisier signals, because hair helps keep the scalp soft and the contact stable.
There are a few ways to use EEG:
- Ongoing EEG is the raw, continuous activity happening all the time.
- Event-related potentials (ERPs) are small evoked blips that track attention resources, used mostly in research.
- Quantitative EEG (QEEG) takes a baseline recording and compares it against a normative database of several thousand people your age.
The word "quantitative" refers to the analysis, not the recording. We are asking how unusual your brain looks compared to everyone else at your age. Once we know where the statistically unusual features are, we ask what those patterns tend to mean at a population level, then look at whether that meaning matters for your goals.
Two facts about these databases. They are large and stable. And you do not change much relative to other people year over year. Map you today and again in a year, and the two maps look nearly identical, unless you did something significant to your brain in between: a serious meditation practice, neurofeedback, a head injury.
Why a Brain Map Is a Hypothesis, Not a Diagnosis
Because we compare you against a population, the patterns are valid at the population level and may not hold for you individually. A QEEG is a hypothesis generator and a prognostic tool. I use it to find candidate bottlenecks, then I check whether those candidates explain anything you actually experience.
Where Did Neurofeedback Come From?
The field grew out of sleep science, which is why so much of the language is borrowed from sleep research. In the late 1960s, an EEG scientist named Barry Sterman was at UCLA when NASA brought him a problem: astronauts breathing rocket fuel vapors, methyl hydrazine, were getting sick, and NASA wanted to know how dangerous the exposure was.
Sterman ran an exposure study with cats. Most showed a clean dose-dependent curve, where more exposure meant more symptoms, building toward seizures. A subset required more exposure before showing any instability. Those cats were seizure resistant, and he could not explain why, until he remembered that those same cats had earlier been in a different experiment. He had used operant conditioning, the same logic as Skinner shaping a pigeon's behavior, to teach the cats to raise a specific brain rhythm in exchange for a reward. Months later, that trained rhythm had left them resistant to chemically induced seizures (Sterman et al., 1969).
Sterman's lab manager had uncontrolled epilepsy. She was having frequent tonic-clonic seizures on heavy anticonvulsants that were not working. She asked him to build her the same machine. Over several years of training she came off her medications and stayed seizure free for an extended period (Sterman & Friar, 1972). Later, Sterman's review of the sensorimotor rhythm work reported that most subjects across the published studies dropped their seizures substantially, with a subset achieving full control over long follow-up (Sterman, 2000). In my own observation of people training for epilepsy, I usually see seizures largely reduced over about three or four months.
From there the work spread. Because EEG researchers already understood sleep deeply, they found the same techniques that reduced seizures also improved sleep onset, sleep maintenance, and sleep architecture. The reliable, low-hanging fruit today is sleep, anxiety, and ADHD. Most people can substantially reduce ADHD symptoms with roughly 40 sessions over three or four months.
Why Does Neurofeedback Work?
Your brain is already changing all the time. The question is how you would like to direct that change.
Neurons that fire together wire together. If you practice a firing pattern, the circuit reorganizes. Send someone to a piano lesson today and by evening the hand-related representations in their motor cortex have shifted (Pascual-Leone et al., 1995). That kind of rewiring happens fast. Building genuinely new circuits takes longer. So the brain runs on a short-to-weeks timescale of change, and learning is that change in action. This is well-established neuroplasticity.
People often ask whether neurofeedback improves the mind or the brain. As a cognitive neuroscientist, I do not find that division meaningful. The mind is the part of the brain you happen to be aware of, and most of what the brain does runs below awareness. Some things are primarily physiological. You will never talk-therapy your way out of the novelty-seeking, high-stimulus ADHD brain, though you can build behavioral scaffolding around it. Other things, like anxiety and trauma, often start as psychological patterns that then drive physiological change. Once the brain has learned a pattern, the physiological-versus-psychological split stops being useful.
What Does a QEEG Actually Measure?
We place a cap with about 21 sensors: 19 channels plus two ear clips. That number comes straight from sleep research, which is why 19-channel databases are the standard for comparison. We could get more. At higher electrode counts the spatial precision of EEG improves. For most brain-training work that is overkill, so we read the 19 channels against the reference database, adjusting for your age along a regression line through the data.
My late mentor in this field, Jack Johnstone, co-authored a strong review of the commercial databases, their sizes, and their strengths and weaknesses (Johnstone et al., 2005). Jack talked about endophenotypes, which is essentially what we now call biomarkers. These are sub-components below the level of a diagnostic label, patterns that recur across people and represent resource differences inside you. I care about the resource, not the label sitting on top of it.
The Markers I Read
Theta/beta ratio. A single ratio at the vertex of the head is among the most studied EEG markers for executive function and was the basis for the first FDA-cleared EEG aid for ADHD assessment. It separates many ADHD from non-ADHD brains, though its accuracy varies across samples (Snyder et al., 2008; Arns et al., 2013). In older adults with memory complaints, an elevated theta/beta ratio has been associated with cognitive decline. The ratio is a useful sorting marker, not a diagnosis.
Peak alpha frequency. Alpha speeds up into early adulthood as your neurons finish myelinating, then slows in later life. When you sit well below your age peers, your processing speed has dropped enough that word-finding and pulling items from memory get hard. Peak alpha frequency tracks cognitive and processing speed (Klimesch, 1999). That is a speed-of-processing problem, not a memory-storage problem.
Eyes-open slow frequencies. Your visual system idles in alpha with eyes closed. Open your eyes and that alpha should suppress and give way to beta. If alpha stays parked with your eyes open, I read inattention. Excess frontal theta with eyes open, in the dopamine-driven frontal cortex, reads as an ADHD-type pattern. I will not hand you a label. I will say "high theta state, so the pattern leans impulsive and novelty-seeking," then ask whether that works for you or gets in your way. Your answer sets how aggressively we go after it.
Connectivity. Bang your head and connectivity changes. You break tracks and pick up subtle inflammation, and that shows up reliably. We compare against injury-specific databases to gauge whether the pattern fits an injury or fits something else, like sleep deprivation.
Hot spots. Certain frequencies parked over certain cortex point to specific resource problems. Beta over the frontal midline tracks with OCD. Beta over the rear midline tracks with PTSD. Excess beta through the middle usually means over-arousal: trouble settling for sleep, pain, a brain that will not down-regulate.
What Brain Maps Reveal About Mood and Medication
Richie Davidson, one of the major figures linking mood and EEG, showed that frontal alpha asymmetry is a marker associated with depression. Normally the left frontal cortex drives an approach-oriented, optimistic, glass-half-full stance. When the right becomes relatively more active than the left, the pattern shifts toward an avoidant, glass-half-empty stance (Davidson, 1992; Henriques & Davidson, 1991). Across many papers this holds at the population level.
Brain maps can also signal whether medications are likely to work before the person feels it. One of my dissertation committee chairs, Andy Leuchter, found that early EEG changes within the first week or so of starting an antidepressant can predict later response (Leuchter et al., 2002; Cook et al., 2002). The average person cycles through several antidepressants before finding one that fits. Reading the brain early may shorten that search.
Case Examples From the Maps
A man in his late twenties came in extremely impulsive, with a cutting comment ready before you finished your sentence, abusing substances, unable to hold a job or friendships. His map showed excess theta (an ADHD-type pattern), a frontal beta hot spot (an OCD-type pattern), and the asymmetry pattern associated with depression. After about 30 sessions of neurofeedback, the OCD and depression markers cleared on the map. He still felt a touch of ADHD, but it no longer interfered with his work or relationships. A year later the gains held. This is a single composite observation, not a clinical claim about what neurofeedback will do for any one person.
Another client could not sleep because he had spent roughly 25 years drinking more than a bottle of wine plus a sedative every night. He did not crave alcohol. He was trying to use less of it, but without it his brain could not fall asleep. After years of heavy drinking, chronic alcohol exposure suppresses the brain's own GABA signaling. His first map, taken the day he left a 45-day medically supervised detox and completely sober, showed high beta everywhere, the signature of a brain that could not down-regulate. After three months of training, he was lying down on my office couch to fall asleep just to prove he could. A year later it held.
What Neurofeedback Actually Does
We measure your brain rhythms moment to moment, and whenever they shift in the direction we want, we reward the brain with audio and video feedback. Think Skinner's pigeons, not Pavlov's dog. We take patterns that already exist and shape them up or down, then watch whether your resources improve.
We can train EEG rhythms, or we can train blood flow through hemoencephalography for migraines, executive function, and social processing. Unlike body-based biofeedback such as heart rate variability, neurofeedback is almost entirely involuntary. You cannot feel the small rewarded shifts. You watch a screen, a simple game runs a little better when your brain does the right thing and stutters when it does not, and over time the brain updates its regulation.
Nearly all of this is non-invasive. There is a role for micro-stimulation, but the large majority of neurofeedback does not zap anything, and it does not need to. A typical course is about 40 sessions over three months, three times a week. That is usually enough to make real progress on ADHD, anxiety, and sleep for many people, and to make a dent in larger problems like seizures and depression.
Where the Evidence Is Strongest
The research base is large but uneven: thousands of papers, many with small samples and weak controls. There are structural reasons. Change takes months, EEG is hard to blind, and nobody owns neurofeedback, so there is no company willing to fund the multimillion-dollar trials. Field results often outrun the published literature. With that caveat, here is where I find the evidence most convincing:
- Addiction. Alpha-theta protocols have been associated with improved abstinence rates in alcohol dependence in early controlled work (Peniston & Kulkosky, 1989).
- Alpha-theta training holds you in a hypnagogic state, halfway between waking and sleep. The insight and creativity that usually bubble up just before you fall asleep, and then vanish, can be accessed and held there.
- OCD. CBT with exposure is the standard, but a substantial share of people drop out because exposure work is hard. Neurofeedback is being explored as an alternative route.
- Depression. Many small studies, plus some better ones, with follow-up data suggesting durability for some people.
- PTSD and performance. Alpha-theta work shows both symptom reduction and creativity gains in performance studies (Egner & Gruzelier, 2003). Through the Homecoming for Veterans program, we provide free training to veterans at our centers.
Meta-analytic work on ADHD neurofeedback reports effects with stability at follow-up for standard protocols (Arns et al., 2009; Van Doren et al., 2019).
Questions I Get Asked
Can you boost delta for deep sleep? Yes. If the map shows too little delta we work to raise it; too much, we lower it. The approach spans a wide age range.
Can this reverse Alzheimer's? Once Alzheimer's is established, there is too much tissue damage in the medial temporal lobe to expect benefit from training. The better path is the metabolic work, addressing the panel of markers that, when several fall out of range, are associated with progression toward dementia. Bringing those back into range is where the more promising work sits.
How do brain maps correlate with neurotransmitter levels? Very weakly. Absolute neurotransmitter levels are nearly meaningless from the scalp. The simple chemical imbalance story was more a marketing frame than a validated hypothesis. What matters is range. In Parkinson's, motor symptoms appear only after a large fraction of dopamine neurons are lost. You may see theta waves alongside low dopamine, but it is a coarse, indirect signal.
The Working Principle
I run Peak Brain like a fitness center, not a doctor's office. I ask what you want, then I read your map for the bottleneck that stands between you and that goal, and we train the circuit until the bottleneck eases. If you are deciding whether this fits your situation, start by getting an actual QEEG brain map read against your goals, then build a 40-session plan around the one or two markers that explain the most about your day.
References
- Sterman (1972). Suppression of seizures in an epileptic following sensorimotor EEG feedback training. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(72)90028-4
- Sterman (2000). Basic Concepts and Clinical Findings in the Treatment of Seizure Disorders with EEG Operant Conditioning. doi:10.1177/155005940003100111
- Pascual-Leone (1995). The role of reading activity on the modulation of motor cortical outputs to the reading hand in Braille readers. doi:10.1002/ana.410380611
- Johnstone (2005). Clinical Database Development: Characterization of EEG Phenotypes. doi:10.1177/155005940503600209
- Klimesch (1999). EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00056-3
- Davidson (1991). Left frontal hypoactivation in depression. doi:10.1037/0021-843x.100.4.535
- Leuchter (2002). Early changes in prefrontal activity characterize clinical responders to antidepressants. doi:10.1016/S0893-133X(02)00294-4
- Peniston (1989). Alpha-theta brainwave training and beta-endorphin levels in alcoholics. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.1989.tb00325.x
- Egner (2003). Ecological validity of neurofeedback: modulation of slow wave EEG enhances musical performance. doi:10.1097/00001756-200307010-00006
- Arns (2019). Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. doi:10.1007/s00787-018-1121-4