Ny merch finns just nu på: https://shop.ijustwanttobecool.se/ Kolla in redan idag! Är samhället beroende av smartphones? Ja. Nu ska vi se hur våra hjärnor påverkas när man tar bort smartphones ur våra liv! KIKA IN VÅR HELT EGEN LÅNGFILM HÄR: https://www.ijustwanttobecool.se/trippen NI HITTAR VÅR MERCH HÄR 👉 https://shop.ijustwanttobecool.se/ Vill du bli medlem på vår kanal? https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGErcRAnYObPBiqcZYPltEA/join På TikTok heter vi IJustWantToBeCool Länk: https://bit.ly/2RKfvBb Kollar gärna in våra andra kanaler! Sveriges bästa sketcher: https://www.youtube.com/user/IJustWantToBeCool Sveriges bästa gamingkanal: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbuhrs2MVHtt_iyGtfwWlxA Missa inte! Vår podcast VAD? Den hittar du här: https://www.podplay.com/sv-se/podcasts/vad-med-ijustwanttobecool-1284978 OCH MISSA ABSOLUT INTEEEE! Vår Discord - https://bit.ly/3wiuEZi Instagram: IjustWantToBeCool - https://bit.ly/3ixhdRp joel_adolphson - https://bit.ly/2RKgocZ victorbeer - https://bit.ly/3zgk1bs eemilbeer - https://bit.ly/3gdlyYp
Episode Summary
I had the chance to sit down with three people from the Swedish comedy channel IJustWantToBeCool for an episode where they gave up their smartphones for a month and let me map their brains before and after. The conversation originally aired in the video "KAN VI ÖVERLEVA 1 MÅNAD UTAN SMARTPHONES?" and you can watch the original conversation. What follows is my read on what we measured, why it looked the way it did, and what you can actually take from an experiment like this.
To protect the participants, I'll talk about them by what their data showed rather than by name.
What does a QEEG brain map actually measure?
Before anyone gave up a phone, we ran two things. First, a 15-minute continuous performance test, where you sit and click in response to targets. That test gives me reaction time, reaction-time variability, and how your attention holds up when the task gets boring. Second, a quantitative EEG, where we put a cap of electrodes on the scalp, fill each site with conductive gel to get a clean signal, and record the microvolt-level electrical activity coming off your cortex.
We don't inject anything. We don't read your thoughts. The gel just bridges the electrode to your skin so the amplifier can pick up the rhythms underneath. We then take that recording, edit out the blinks and muscle tension that contaminate the signal, and look at how much power sits in each frequency band across each region. If you want the full picture of how this works and what it can and can't tell you, I've written it up in the QEEG brain mapping guide.
One participant's baseline showed a strong visual processing system with the auditory side lagging behind it. That kind of split shows up in how someone takes in information, and it's the sort of detail a map gives you that a self-report never will.
Why does scrolling feel so hard to stop?
Every one of them described the same loop. The TV gets a little boring, the phone comes out. Waiting for the bus, phone. On the toilet, phone. The second life feels under-stimulating, the device fills the gap.
That loop is dopamine doing exactly what it evolved to do. Dopamine isn't the pleasure chemical people think it is. It's a prediction and salience signal. It fires hardest in anticipation of a variable reward, and the social feed is the most efficient variable-reward machine ever built. You pull to refresh, sometimes you get something good, mostly you don't, and the uncertainty itself is what keeps the circuit firing. The basal ganglia turn that repeated behavior into an automatic routine, which is why your hand reaches for the phone before you've decided to. That handoff from effortful prefrontal control to automatic striatal control is the same machinery behind any habit. I walk through it in more depth in biohacking bad habits.
When the input is constant, the system stays in a near-permanent state of mild overstimulation. My hypothesis going in was simple. Pull the constant input, and a brain that has been running on that overstimulation might recover some of its capacity to sustain attention through boredom.
Does giving up your phone actually improve attention?
For one participant, yes, and the map showed it. After the month, attention span and reaction time both improved. His own description was the right one: the brain stopped zooming off the moment it lost constant input. He'd gotten better at being bored.
That matches what we know about attention as a trainable resource rather than a fixed trait. Sustained attention depends on frontal and frontoparietal networks holding a goal in place while filtering distraction. When you remove the easiest possible distraction and force the system to sit with under-stimulation, you give those networks repeated practice. Several weeks of that is enough to start nudging the measures. The participant who improved is the same one who said, sitting in a parked car with nothing to do, that he wasn't even craving the scroll anymore. That tells you the scrolling wasn't adding much value. The withdrawal was mild and the attentional payoff was real. If you want the broader picture on training attention, does neurofeedback work for ADHD covers the same circuits.
Why did one brain look worse after a month off the phone?
This is where the experiment got interesting, and where I want to be honest about a result that surprised the participant.
One person came back with better reaction time but worse focus and a brain that read as more stressed and more tired than at baseline. He expected the opposite. The reason was sleep. He slept badly across the month, and poor sleep degrades everything downstream of it.
Sleep is when your brain clears metabolic waste, consolidates the day's learning, and resets the balance between excitation and inhibition in cortex. Lose sleep and you see it directly in the EEG as increased slow-wave activity intruding into waking states, the signature of a tired cortex. Prefrontal regions that handle executive control are the first to suffer, which is exactly why his focus dropped even as his reaction speed held. Stress compounds it. Carrying more sympathetic load all day, which his map suggested, wears down the resources you need for sustained cognitive work. I've laid out how sleep drives next-day cognition in biohacking sleep.
Removing a smartphone carries no automatic cognitive benefit. The phone wasn't his problem. The lost sleep was. He'd half-joked that the worse he felt, the better he performed, because his reaction time improved while tired. That's a misread of the data. A faster button press under fatigue doesn't mean the brain is better off. The stress and the focus decline tell the real story.
Why is it so hard to function without a smartphone at all?
Every participant ran into the same wall, and it had nothing to do with brain chemistry. Parking meters that only accept an app. Public transit with no physical card. A bank card never activated because payment lives in the phone. A climbing wall that needs an app to light up the holds. A coat check that wants a QR scan. One of them got locked out of his own building at midnight because the entry system runs through an app he no longer had.
The friction these three hit over and over was infrastructure, not withdrawal. The society around them assumes a smartphone the way it once assumed you could read a sign or feed a coin into a meter. One of them even got a message mid-experiment warning that 2G and 3G were being retired and his phone would soon stop working at all.
This matters for how you interpret the results. When people report feeling worse off a phone, a large share of that distress is the logistical breakdown. The same participant who hated the daily friction also reported, separately, that he didn't miss the scrolling at all. Two different systems, two different stories.
What can you actually take from this?
A few things hold up across the three brains we measured.
The craving fades faster than people expect. By week three, the participants weren't reaching for a phone in the in-between moments. The standing-in-line reflex faded. That fits what we know about habit extinction. Remove the cue and the behavior, and the automatic loop weakens over a few weeks. This is the same window I describe in making new habits stick.
Boredom is trainable, and training it pays off. The participant whose attention improved did it by repeatedly sitting in under-stimulation instead of filling it. You don't need a month-long phone fast to practice this. Leaving the phone in another room during meals, or letting yourself wait without reaching for it, exercises the same networks. If you want a structured version of sitting with a quiet mind, start with mindfulness.
Protect sleep above everything. The one brain that got worse got worse because of lost sleep, not lost screen time. If you change your habits and your sleep degrades, the cognitive cost will swamp any benefit from the change itself.
Two of the three discovered the device was doing real work for them, from navigation to payment to staying in the loop on things they cared about. A smartphone is both a dopamine machine and a genuine tool, and an experiment like this separates those two roles cleanly. The dopamine part, they could drop without much loss. The tool part, the world has made nearly mandatory.
If you're curious whether your own attention, sleep, or stress patterns are trainable, a brain map is where I'd start, because it tells you which circuit is actually driving the pattern before you change anything. That's the difference between guessing and measuring.