Access Flow Whenever You Want and Become Indistractible: http://GetMoreFlow.com Founding Director of Peak Brain Institute and Lead Neurotherapist. Dr. Hill is one of the top peak performance coaches in the country. He holds a Ph.D. in Cognitive Neuroscience from UCLA’s Department of Psychology and continues to do research on attention and cognition. Research methodology includes EEG, QEEG, and ERP. He has been practicing neurofeedback since 2003. In addition to founding Peak Brain Institute, Dr. Hill is the host of the Head First Podcast with Dr. Hill and lectures at UCLA, teaching courses in psychology, neuroscience, and gerontology. ABOUT THE EPISODE: In this episode, you will learn about: - Intro (00:00) - Core Focus of Dr Andrew's PhD (01:56) - What Biofeedback & Neurofeedback Is (10:16) - Relationship Between ADHD & Flow (20:46) - How To Get Benefits From Neurofeedback (28:00) - Effects of Post-COVID on the Brain (33:49) - Important Neuroscience Habits & Behavior Changes (41:08) - Convergence of Buddhism & Science (46:31) RESOURCES: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/andrewhillphd/?hl=en (@andrewhillphd) LinkedIn:https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrewhillucla/ Website: https://peakbraininstitute.com/ Access Flow Whenever You Want and Become Indistractible === GetMoreFlow.com
Episode Summary
This conversation originally aired on the Steven Kotler / Flow Research Collective Radio podcast, where Rhian Doris and I talked through neurofeedback, attention, ADHD, post-COVID brain, and the daily habits that actually move brain performance. You can watch the original conversation. What follows is drawn from my side of that discussion, written up here in more detail.
What did my PhD in cognitive neuroscience actually study?
Cognitive neuroscience is the overlap of mind and brain. My question was how the mind produces attention. I worked at UCLA with Dr. Eran Zaidel, one of the last scientists in the lineage of the split-brain research that Roger Sperry and Joseph Bogan ran in the late 1950s and 1960s.
That work started as a treatment for medication-resistant seizures. A seizure builds when a small patch of cortex fires a coherent discharge, recruits its neighbors, and then bounces the signal back and forth across the corpus callosum, the large white-matter tract connecting the two hemispheres. Cut that tract and the seizure can no longer build to a grand mal event. The surprising part: people recovered with very little obvious deficit, even after severing the largest information highway in the brain.
The subtler effects showed up under careful testing. Present an object to one hand out of sight, and a patient could name it with the right hand but not the left, because language production usually lives in the left hemisphere. Zaidel built on this by flashing stimuli into one visual field at a time and routing the task through one hemisphere or the other. I came into his lab with neurofeedback experience and ran one of the first double-blind, sham-controlled neurofeedback studies: 40 people, five consecutive days, a 64-channel cap recording how the brain reacted to being rewarded for changing its own activity. I was tracking hemispheric specificity, frequency specificity, and changes on attention testing across a short course of training.
If you want the imaging side of how we read a brain at rest today, I cover that in the QEEG brain mapping guide.
What is biofeedback, and how is neurofeedback different?
Biofeedback takes a body signal you normally cannot perceive, like heart rate or skin temperature, and makes it visible so you can learn to change it. Heart rate variability training and old-school hand-warming for headaches are biofeedback. The signals live in the peripheral nervous system, outside the skull and spine.
Neurofeedback is biofeedback on the central nervous system. Because the brain has no sensory nerve endings reporting its own electrical activity, the change happens through involuntary operant conditioning rather than conscious control. You cannot feel your brainwaves the way you feel your heartbeat, which is why the process seems mysterious until you sit with it.
You can read more on the broader question of whether the method holds up in Is Neurofeedback Legitimate?.
What does a neurofeedback session actually do to the brain?
Take a concrete goal: better executive function and less distractibility. There is a brainwave called SMR, sensorimotor rhythm, a low-beta rhythm. If you have watched a cat on a windowsill tracking a bird, you have seen SMR. Still body, laser focus. Animals make SMR as an inhibitory state, and a brain with poor SMR tone tends toward seizure activity (Sterman & Egner, 2006).
The opposite end is theta. High theta with low SMR looks like air in the brake lines: the brain is reactive, distractible, biased toward the outside world rather than the goal. That high-theta, low-SMR pattern maps onto the classic ADHD state, and elevated theta-to-beta ratio is one of the most replicated EEG findings in ADHD research (Arns et al., 2013).
During training, we place a sensor over the region involved in attention monitoring and measure SMR and theta moment to moment. When SMR rises and theta drops, the software rewards the brain: the Pac-Man eats more dots, the spaceship flies better. A couple of seconds later the brain drifts the wrong way, the game stalls, the reward stops. Then it drifts back and the reward resumes. Every few seconds we move the goalposts. Over half an hour, the brain gets bursts of feedback for trending in the trained direction, and because the mind cannot perceive its own brainwaves, it never figures out the rule. It simply adapts.
After three or four sessions, the brain starts reaching for the trained state on its own. People describe it as feeling calm, and the behavioral effects show up in ordinary places. I get calls from parents saying their kid took the trash out the first time they were asked. The discovery story behind this is real and worth knowing: Dr. Barry Sterman at UCLA had trained SMR in cats, then later found those same cats resisted seizures when exposed to a convulsant rocket-fuel vapor (Sterman & Friar, 1972). His lab manager, an epileptic on heavy medication, trained her SMR up over several months, came off her medications, and stayed seizure-free. That was the start of the field in the late 1960s.
I go deeper on this specific rhythm in SMR Neurofeedback: Train Sleep, Focus, and Self-Control, and on the release-state rhythm in Decoding Alpha Waves.
What is the relationship between ADHD and flow?
The classic ADHD brain has powerful resources and trouble directing them. Think hunter versus gatherer. The hunter performs under high-stress, high-stimulus conditions and stalls out weeding the garden or doing the taxes. That is a natural variant, and we need both kinds of brains. Problematic ADHD is getting stuck too far in one mode and being unable to switch out of it. The brain responds to the environment rather than self-directing attention: intense things turn it on, boring things leave it unable to engage even when it should.
I split flow into two types. One is the non-linear access state, close to the hypnagogic moment as you fall asleep, when solutions and insights pop up. That state couples tightly with creativity and aha insights, and you can reach it through alpha-theta neurofeedback, almost dissociatively, with eyes closed. The other is executive flow, the highly focused, highly present engagement you see in high performers and athletes.
ADHD brains are gifted at the non-linear, creative end. Theta around six and a half hertz is a receptive-memory state, the substrate for fluid intelligence, for taking an old idea and applying it a novel way, for jumping from the linear into the insightful. ADHD brains make plenty of theta, so they move, they associate, they see the elegant solution. What is hard for them is sinking into the executive sweet spot where arousal, focus, and activation are all dialed in and held there, because that requires internal maintenance.
Train the stuckness out and the gifts stay. The research on a few months of neurofeedback shows meaningful change on attention testing without robbing the brain of its non-linear, high-stimulus capacity (Arns et al., 2009). You keep the creative engine and gain the ability to sit in a classroom or a boardroom. Teaching meditation does something similar by blunting the distractibility and impulsivity. I cover the training path in detail in the neurofeedback for ADHD guide and the performance side in Biohacking Flow State.
How do you actually get benefits from neurofeedback?
Treat it like sophisticated personal training. You would not start a strength program without an assessment, and you should not start brain training without one. We map your brain at rest with a QEEG and test your attention skills, comparing both against an age-matched database to find the bottlenecks. Then we train, usually about half an hour, three or four times a week.
For lasting change, the research and my own observation point to roughly 40 to 50 sessions at minimum. The target is real: someone who starts a couple of standard deviations below the mean on executive function can move above average and stay there, with no upper limit once you cross from fixing into optimizing. The process is iterative, not blind. You report back the next day on sleep, stress, attention, drinking, and mood, and we adjust the protocol. Beta on one side builds self-control, beta on the other builds alertness, so the feedback you give shapes the next workout.
One caution from years of reading brain maps: I hear from people every week who rented a one-size-fits-all system and found an existing brain injury or PTSD pattern got worse, because they were not like everyone else when they started. Use a tailored approach guided by a brain map. Most of our clients now train remotely, mapping in their own kitchens, and many map twice, on and off caffeine or another variable, to run their own before-and-after experiments. On the practical questions of access and price, see How Much Does Neurofeedback Cost in 2026? and the remote neurofeedback guide.
What does post-COVID brain look like, and does it respond to training?
Two years into seeing it in brain maps, post-COVID brain looks a lot like the brains that used to come in with complaints about mold, Lyme, and concussion. It is often a non-specific neuroinflammatory pattern, sometimes more localized on the sides or back of the brain, usually because it anchors to old scar tissue from prior low-grade wear and tear.
It also blooms on a delay, the way a concussion often does not show in the brain right away. People report brain fog, slow processing, irritability, burnout, and low stamina three to six months after infection, and the severity of the acute illness does not predict it well. I see young, healthy people in the maps who were asymptomatic during the infection develop it months later. An early Lancet Psychiatry study found that a substantial share of COVID survivors received a neurological or psychiatric diagnosis within six months of infection, which matches what I see in the data (Taquet et al., 2021).
The encouraging part: it tends to respond the way concussion and chronic stress respond. In what I see, neurofeedback resolves a lot of it over several months. I usually bring more tools to bear too, which is where the lifestyle work comes in. For the broader picture of clearing that fog, see Biohacking Brain Fog.
What are the highest-yield functional neuroscience habits?
Most of us know what supports brain health. Fewer of us know why. I call the coaching framework functional neuroscience, and the brain benefits from getting the body right: sleep regulation, stress regulation, attention regulation. Here is where I start.
Why does meal timing beat light for your circadian rhythm?
When you eat is a powerful external cue for circadian timing, and for peripheral clocks in the body it can outweigh light (Damiola et al., 2000). The light that matters is the color of the sky in the first hour after sunrise, read by the suprachiasmatic nucleus sitting on top of the optic chiasm. Outside that window, light is far less important than the biohacker world tends to claim. Control the timing of food and you control what time of day your brain thinks it is.
Why should you fast before bed?
Give yourself a no-calorie window before sleep, roughly two to three hours for most adults, longer if you are insulin resistant. With insulin low, you release growth hormone once you fall asleep. Go to bed full and the counter-regulatory cortisol spike suppresses that release, so you wake up tired and hungry. Melatonin also suppresses insulin secretion, so eating late forces food into a poor insulin state and drives blood sugar up (Rubio-Sastre et al., 2014). Go to bed hungry and you tend to wake up with energy.
Why get up early and exercise light before eating?
Cortisol wakes you, squeezes the liver, and feeds you breakfast internally, so you should be able to move first thing without food. Fifteen minutes of full-body movement like sun salutations, or 30 minutes of walking, helps trigger intracellular autophagy and exhaust resources. Reaching for a hardcore workout before eating tends to bonk your blood sugar and call for more cortisol, which your body already runs high in the morning, so you build resistance instead of fitness.
When should you do your hard workout?
Move high-intensity training, heavy lifting, hard steady-state, and HIIT to the afternoon, when cardiac output is highest and resting cortisol is lowest. The sympathetic spike you create then does something useful rather than piling onto an already-elevated morning state.
These pieces stack with the metabolic and sleep work I write about in Strategic Fasting, Biohacking Sleep, and Biohacking Your Morning. The accessible tools, an Oura ring, a ketone meter, a body-fat scale, a lipid panel, let you run your own loop: change something, watch it move, change it again. That agency is the point.
Where do neuroscience and Buddhism converge?
Asked what question I would hand a research genie, I land on consciousness. The deeper I go into neuroscience, and the more it converges with Buddhism, the less I believe in a fixed self and the more I see a moment-to-moment construction, an evolutionary device that keeps us feeding, fighting, and managing in-group and out-group resources. I have watched consciousness get interrupted too many times, in too many ways, to be confident there is a self beyond the moment-to-moment manifestation of the body. A genuine scientific account of consciousness would be hard to run in humans, but I suspect it would advance us, the way the Buddhist observation about attachment and the reactive self points toward less suffering.
If you want to keep building the practice side of that, start with Mindfulness: Don't Just Do Something, Sit There and the neuroscience in Biohacking Meditation.
The through-line across all of this is agency. Map your brain, learn what it is doing, train the resources you want, and steer the body to support the changes. You do not need to stay a passenger to your own attention.
References
- Arns (2013). A Decade of EEG Theta/Beta Ratio Research in ADHD: A Meta-Analysis. doi:10.1177/1087054712460087
- Sterman (1972). Suppression of seizures in an epileptic following sensorimotor EEG feedback training. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(72)90028-4
- Arns (2009). Efficacy of Neurofeedback Treatment in ADHD: The Effects on Inattention, Impulsivity and Hyperactivity: A Meta-Analysis. doi:10.1177/155005940904000311
- Taquet (2021). 6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236 379 survivors of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00084-5
- Damiola (2000). Restricted feeding uncouples circadian oscillators in peripheral tissues from the central pacemaker in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. doi:10.1101/gad.183500